J.D. Vance Reveals to Joe Rogan: “Fight or Flight” Kicked In After False Alarm of Trump Assassination
October 31, 2024
Ohio Senator J.D. Vance revealed a profoundly intense “fight or flight” moment during an appearance on Joe Rogan’s podcast, after having wrongly believed that former President Donald Trump had been assassinated. That’s how the high-profile conservative was reacting, feeling the attack on one of the most influential figures of his party-a simple reflection of today’s political landscape and Vance’s dedication to Trump personally.
Moment of Reckoning
Vance related to Rogan how the incident began with a flurry of unconfirmed social media reports. “I remember getting this notification and just freezing,” Vance accounted for, describing how an immediate surge of adrenaline and panic overcame him. The incident came amidst very high security concerns for public figures, adding weight to what he initially thought was real. “For a split second, I truly thought it was over-that he was gone.”
That first report would prove false, but for Vance, those few moments were enlightening. The senator said he felt “paralyzed” before going into what he described as “fight or flight mode,” a physical response that he says epitomizes just how much he feels invested in the project of defending Trump and the ideas he represents.
Behind the Reaction
An ally to the former president, Vance’s political identity has become closely associated with that of Trump. Since being sworn in, Vance has voted for Trump’s priorities and tried to carry Trump’s torch in the Senate on immigration, economic protectionism, and, above all, cultural conservatism.
During his podcast appearance, Vance framed the reaction as not about Trump, the man, but the symbolic role Trump played in his version of American politics. “This wasn’t just about one man; it was about the movement and what we’ve all worked to build,” he told Rogan. Vance is part of the continuity of ideals championed by Trump: appeal to middle America, opposition to globalist policies, fight for an America-first approach.
The Greater Consequences Vance’s visceral reaction speaks to a larger issue roiling his political base. During the interview, Vance spoke of increasing threats to politicians on both sides of the aisle. “The environment is increasingly polarized,” he said. “It’s a dangerous time in politics,” he said. Vance called for increased security measures and called for a cultural shift to ratchet down the temperature of political rhetoric in America.
Rogan, who is never afraid to interview bluntly, pushed Vance further on security concerns and how political figures are more in danger than ever. The two discuss some recent incidents regarding public figures that tiptoe that thin line between a passionate disagreement and violence by extremism. Vance was worried that unchecked rhetoric and misinformation online escalate a probably dangerous setting against political leaders.
Personal Vulnerability
Vance, himself a former Marine, said even his military training hadn’t compared with how incomprehensibly different it was from what he had ever experienced. He went on to say that this question called into jeopardy the psychological toll that politics takes. “We’re all human, and moments like that remind us of just how vulnerable we are,” he said. Vance took in the opportunity to add that, since they are public figures, he and his family continue to go through a great deal of stress and fear. He said he was committed to serving but does worry about personal risks.
Wrapping up the podcast was Vance emphasizing the civility that has to exist in the political domain and how Americans have to understand one another more than be hostile towards one another. “We need to look at where we’re going,” he told Rogan. “We can’t keep escalating like this.”
A Window into Political Dedication
But for Vance, this false alarm was more than a scare; it was a call to remind him of his devotion to the political ideals and loyalty to Trump’s legacy. His reaction speaks volumes about deep polar divisions in American politics and unique pressures public-office holders are facing. As polarization deepens, Vance’s comments expose politicians’ thinking as the hostile environment worsens.
In a day when politics can bring about very volatile reactions, Vance’s musings ring out as an appeal to recognition of the stress and sacrifice involved in political life-and all the humanness at the core of those who serve within it.